---

[ July Full List | Reply ]

---

Re: IP Address Caching of Slurp@inktomi From Dan at PerfumeMart.Com on 18 July '99 replying to Re: IP Address Caching of Slurp@inktomi posted by Jim Resubmitting over 2,500 urls is out of the question. These urls ended up in the inktomi database by spiders alone anyway. I did not submit all the urls. I just do not want to wait for the whole process to start all over again. It took a long time for these pages to get where they are and the last thing I need is for them to be dropped. I'm waiting for an official response from inktomi, and I'll let you know if I hear anything >It's interesting that a program dedicated to keeping things up to date >is the LAST one to conform :) > >>Does anyone know if Slurp will ever update its cache or do I need to >>deactivate the old IP and Webserver to force Inktomi to update? >>I'm concerned that if I deactivate the ip, the spider will just drop >>the url instead of updating the DNS/IP entry. > >If I were you, I would deactivate the old IP then resubmit all the >URLs, which will hopefully force it to take a fresh look in any case.

Reply to this message
Required Details
Your name:
Subject:

Optional Details
Home page title:
Home page URL:
Email: (if you'd like to receive automatic replies by email)
Your Message
>Resubmitting over 2,500 urls is out of the question. These urls >ended up in the inktomi database by spiders alone anyway. I did >not submit all the urls. I just do not want to wait for the whole process >to start all over again. It took a long time for these pages to get where >they are and the last thing I need is for them to be dropped. > >I'm waiting for an official response from inktomi, and I'll let you >know if I hear anything > >>It's interesting that a program dedicated to keeping things up to date >>is the LAST one to conform :) >> >>>Does anyone know if Slurp will ever update its cache or do I need to >>>deactivate the old IP and Webserver to force Inktomi to update? >>>I'm concerned that if I deactivate the ip, the spider will just drop >>>the url instead of updating the DNS/IP entry. >> >>If I were you, I would deactivate the old IP then resubmit all the >>URLs, which will hopefully force it to take a fresh look in any case. >