---

[ October Full List | Reply ]

---

Re: Odd, would have thought this page was spamming the indexes. From Nicholas on 3 Oct '99 replying to Re: Odd, would have thought this page was spamming the indexes. posted by IonZone >>Odd, would have thought this page was spamming the indexes, >>what with all the repetition. But it ranks very well in many >>of the search engines: >> >>www.emsps.com/oldtools/phrases.htm >> >>Anyone know why it's not being penalized by the SEs? > >Whats the spam? I don't see it. Well, it repeats words like "old" and "used" as a very high percentage of the total body text.

Re: Odd, would have thought this page was spamming the indexes. - IonZone - 04/10/99 Re: Odd, would have thought this page was spamming the indexes. - Nicholas - 04/10/99 Re: Odd, would have thought this page was spamming the indexes. - cybereye - 04/10/99 Re: Odd, would have thought this page was spamming the indexes. - Inachu - 04/10/99 Re: Odd, would have thought this page was spamming the indexes. - Nicholas - 04/10/99

Reply to this message
Required Details
Your name:
Subject:

Optional Details
Home page title:
Home page URL:
Email: (if you'd like to receive automatic replies by email)
Your Message
>>>Odd, would have thought this page was spamming the indexes, >>>what with all the repetition. But it ranks very well in many >>>of the search engines: >>> >>>www.emsps.com/oldtools/phrases.htm >>> >>>Anyone know why it's not being penalized by the SEs? >> >>Whats the spam? I don't see it. > >Well, it repeats words like "old" and "used" as a very high >percentage of the total body text.